home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / dcom / modems-part2 / 10108 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  1.0 KB
  1. Path: bristlecone.together.net!usenet
  2. From: krw@together.net
  3. Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
  4. Subject: Re: Internal vs, External ?
  5. Date: 4 Apr 1996 04:14:52 GMT
  6. Organization: TGF Internet Services
  7. Message-ID: <4jvibs$57s@bristlecone.together.net>
  8. References: <3156c11c.771682@news.essex1.com> <4j6o5m$36f@aplinfo.jhuapl.edu> <4jaosh$jg@lenny.rosenet.net> <4jchnu$neu@vixc.voyager.net> <4jd9on$rho@dns.ktb.net>
  9. Reply-To: krw@together.net
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: vtr126.ramp.together.net
  11. X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2
  12.  
  13. In <4jd9on$rho@dns.ktb.net>, bashley@ktb.net (Bev) writes:
  14. >With a switch, you can share an external among several computers.
  15.  
  16.   With a simple network you can share the modem simultaneously.  
  17.  
  18.   Why do people have to invent reasons to buy external modems?  The
  19.   case for the externals is obvious.  The fact that internals exist is reason
  20.   to believe that that they have a purpose.  I like mine ;-).   
  21. /----------------------------------------------------------
  22. /   Keith R. Williams
  23. /   krw@together.net
  24. /   Burlington Vermont
  25.  
  26.